Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: convert libpq uri-regress tests to tap test
Date: 2022-02-25 17:56:47
Message-ID: 20220225175647.bvordgiauekrbkyj@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-02-24 08:46:23 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm mildly inclined to only do 0001 and 0002 for now. We'd not loose msvc
> coverage, because it already doesn't build the test. Once we've ironed that
> stuff out, we could do 0003?

From what I can see in the buildfarm client, we'd not loose (nor gain) any
buildfarm coverage either. It doesn't run the test today.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2022-02-25 18:22:21 Re: [PATCH] Add reloption for views to enable RLS
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2022-02-25 17:49:42 Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)