Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?

From: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?
Date: 2022-02-10 17:31:06
Message-ID: 20220210173106.zmvyx4cjpj6eep25@hjp.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2022-02-10 10:13:16 +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Am Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:14:39PM -0800 schrieb Guyren Howe:
> > There are huge developer benefits available to focusing
> > more on making a great relational programming environment,
> > well outside the SQL standard.
>
> There's a seemingly small but conceptually rather significant
> difference between going _beyond_ a standard and being _well
> outside_ said standard.

In my opinion:

A change which doesn't alter the semantics of any
standard-conforming query (but only makes some queries valid which
are invalid according to the standard) is an extension.

Not sure if this is true for all of Guyren's proposals, although no
counter-examples immediatly pop into mind.

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-02-10 17:53:27 Re: Passing XML column in an array
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2022-02-10 17:25:45 Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?