| From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest |
| Date: | 2021-10-03 16:20:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20211003162021.GA7908@ahch-to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 11:32:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > On 2021-Oct-02, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Yeah. I have been thinking of looking through the oldest CF entries
> >> and proposing that we just reject any that look permanently stalled.
>
> > I was just going to say the same thing yesterday, and reference [1]
> > when I did it once in 2019. I think it was a useful cleanup exercise.
> > [1] https://postgr.es/m/20190930182818.GA25331@alvherre.pgsql
>
> Right. Michael and Jaime have been doing some of that too in the last
> few days, but obviously a CFM should only do that unilaterally in very
> clear-cut cases of patch abandonment. I was intending to go after some
> where maybe a bit of community consensus is needed for rejection.
>
I have done so with 2 or 3 patches that has been stalled more than one
month and after asking in the thread if I receive no answer for 2 or 3
weeks.
--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2021-10-03 16:23:21 | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest |
| Previous Message | Zhihong Yu | 2021-10-03 15:51:21 | Re: very long record lines in expanded psql output |