From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |
Date: | 2021-07-29 17:43:09 |
Message-ID: | 202107291743.pqlj3s2uilfu@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Jul-29, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> + If the old cluster used extensions, whether from
> + <filename>contrib</filename> or some other source, it used
> + shared object files (or DLLs) to implement these extensions, e.g.,
> + <filename>pgcrypto.so</filename>. Now, shared object files matching
> + the new server binary must be installed in the new cluster, usually
> + via operating system commands. Do not load the schema definitions,
> + e.g., <command>CREATE EXTENSION pgcrypto</command>, because these
> + will be copied from the old cluster. (Extensions should be upgraded
> + later using <literal>ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE</literal>.)
I propose this:
<para>
If the old cluster used shared-object files (or DLLs) for extensions
or other loadable modules, install recompiled versions of those files
onto the new cluster.
Do not install the extension themselves (i.e., do not run
<command>CREATE EXTENSION</command>), because extension definitions
will be carried forward from the old cluster.
</para>
<para>
Extensions can be upgraded after pg_upgrade completes using
<command>ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE</command>, on a per-database
basis.
</para>
I suggest " ... for extensions or other loadable modules" because
loadable modules aren't necessarily for extensions. Also, it's
perfectly possible to have extension that don't have a loadable module.
I suggest "extension definitions ... carried forward" instead of
"extensions ... copied" (your proposed text) to avoid the idea that
files are copied; use it instead of "schema definitions ... upgraded"
(the current docs) to avoid the idea that they are actually upgraded;
also, "schema definition" seems a misleading term to use here.
I suggest "can be upgraded" rather than "should be upgraded" because
we're not making a recommendation, merely stating the fact that it is
possible to do so.
I suggest using the imperative mood, to be consistent with the
surrounding text. (Applies to the first para; the second para is
informative.)
I haven't seen it mentioned in the thread, but I think the final phrase
of this <step> should be a separate step,
<step>
<title>Copy custom full-text search files</title>
<para>
Copy any custom full text search file (dictionary, synonym, thesaurus,
stop word list) to the new server.
</para>
</step>
While this is closely related to extensions, it's completely different.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Sallah, I said NO camels! That's FIVE camels; can't you count?"
(Indiana Jones)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-07-29 18:04:16 | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-07-29 17:15:53 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |