Re: Partition column should be part of PK

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj(dot)sf(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK
Date: 2021-07-08 22:28:39
Message-ID: 202107082228.obnak7c7mx4n@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 2021-Jul-08, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> If I'm not wrong, this is the same thing you asked 2 week ago.
>
> If so, why not continue the conversation on the same thread, and why not
> reference the old thread ?
>
> I went to the effort to find the old conversation.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210625042228.GJ29179@telsasoft.com

Actually, it looks like you're replying to the same email you replied to
two weeks ago.

--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Sofen 2021-07-08 23:12:03 RE: Partition column should be part of PK
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-07-08 22:17:03 Re: Partition column should be part of PK