From: | "Mike Sofen" <msofen(at)runbox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "'Justin Pryzby'" <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'Nagaraj Raj'" <nagaraj(dot)sf(at)yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Partition column should be part of PK |
Date: | 2021-07-08 23:12:03 |
Message-ID: | 080901d7744e$ac0f3d70$042db850$@runbox.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I believe this thread qualifies for the funniest thread of 2021 (so far). And yes, this is a top post. :-)
Mike Sofen
-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2021 3:29 PM
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj(dot)sf(at)yahoo(dot)com>; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partition column should be part of PK
On 2021-Jul-08, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> If I'm not wrong, this is the same thing you asked 2 week ago.
>
> If so, why not continue the conversation on the same thread, and why
> not reference the old thread ?
>
> I went to the effort to find the old conversation.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210625042228.GJ29179@telsasoft
> .com
Actually, it looks like you're replying to the same email you replied to two weeks ago.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manuel Weitzman | 2021-07-09 02:00:54 | Re: Strange execution plan |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-07-08 22:28:39 | Re: Partition column should be part of PK |