From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Atsushi Torikoshi <atorik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Evgeny Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view? |
Date: | 2021-04-08 15:34:25 |
Message-ID: | 20210408153425.GC2439@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:27:04PM -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Apr-07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 10:38:08AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> > > Thanks! And I agree with using query_id in the new field names while keeping
> > > queryid for pg_stat_statements to avoid unnecessary query breakage.
> >
> > I think we need more feedback from the group. Do people agree with the
> > idea above? The question is what to call:
> >
> > GUC compute_queryid
> > pg_stat_activity.queryid
> > pg_stat_statements.queryid
> >
> > using "queryid" or "query_id", and do they have to match?
>
> Seems a matter of personal preference. Mine is to have the underscore
> everywhere in backend code (where this is new), and let it without the
> underscore in pg_stat_statements to avoid breaking existing code. Seems
> to match what Julien is saying.
OK, let's get some details. First, pg_stat_statements.queryid already
exists (no underscore), and I don't think anyone wants to change that.
pg_stat_activity.queryid is new, but I can imagine cases where you would
join pg_stat_activity to pg_stat_statements to get an estimate of how
long the query will take --- having one using an underscore and another
one not seems odd. Also, looking at the existing pg_stat_activity
columns, those don't use underscores before the "id" unless there is a
modifier before the "id", e.g. "pid", "xid":
SELECT attname
FROM pg_namespace JOIN pg_class ON (pg_namespace.oid = relnamespace)
JOIN pg_attribute ON (pg_class.oid = pg_attribute.attrelid)
WHERE nspname = 'pg_catalog' AND
relname = 'pg_stat_activity' AND
attname ~ 'id$';
attname
-------------
backend_xid
datid
leader_pid
pid
queryid
usesysid
We don't have a modifier before queryid.
If people like query_id, and I do too, I am thinking we just keep
query_id as the GUC (compute_query_id), and just accept that the GUC and
SQL levels will not match. This is exactly what we have now. I brought
it up to be sure this is what we want,
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2021-04-08 15:41:41 | Re: VACUUM (DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING on) |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2021-04-08 15:32:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |