Re: libpq debug log

From: 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq debug log
Date: 2021-02-03 14:01:54
Message-ID: 20210203140154.GA25582@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-Feb-03, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:

> (39)
> + of tracing. If (<literal>flags</literal> &amp; <literal>PQTRACE_OUTPUT_TIMESTAMPS</literal>) is
> + true, then timestamp is not printed with each message.
>
> The flag name (OUTPUT) and its description (not printed) doesn't match.
>
> I think you can use less programmatical expression like "If <literal>flags</literal> contains <literal>PQTRACE_OUTPUT_TIMESTAMPS</literal>".

I copied the original style from elsewhere in the manual.

> (41)
> +void
> +PQtraceEx(PGconn *conn, FILE *debug_port, int flags)
> +{

I'm not really sure about making this a separate API call. We could just
make it PQtrace() and increment the libpq so version. I don't think
it's a big deal, frankly.

--
Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W
"El conflicto es el camino real hacia la unión"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 'Alvaro Herrera' 2021-02-03 14:02:18 Re: libpq debug log
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-02-03 13:58:59 Re: libpq debug log