Re: bug in pageinspect's "tuple data" feature

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in pageinspect's "tuple data" feature
Date: 2020-11-24 04:01:53
Message-ID: 20201124040153.GF3046@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:11:26AM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 21/11/2020 21:32, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> This is pretty unhelpful; it would be better not to try to print the
>> data instead of dying. With that, at least you can know where the
>> problem is.
>>
>> This was introduced in d6061f83a166 (2015). Proposed patch to fix it
>> (by having the code print a null "data" instead of dying) is attached.
>
> Null seems misleading. Maybe something like "invalid", or print a warning?

How did you get into this state to begin with? get_raw_page() uses
ReadBufferExtended() which gives some level of protection already, so
shouldn't it be better to return an ERROR with ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED
and the block involved?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2020-11-24 04:17:10 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2020-11-24 03:52:58 Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit