On 2020-Nov-19, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:11:21PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Your patch didn't actually say "try_relation_open", so didn't work.
> > But it does works if I do that, and close the table.
Thanks for fixing and testing.
> That patch broke the case that a non-index is passed, which I addressed here.
Hmm, I think the reaction to that should be the same as before, so
rather than return 0, the patch should raise the same error that
index_open() would.