| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Keisuke Kuroda <keisuke(dot)kuroda(dot)3862(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables |
| Date: | 2020-10-15 20:30:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20201015203026.6hi2ex4rmbvzssef@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-10-15 12:38:49 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:12 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the tests. The latest patch looks mostly good to me. I have
> > > made minor changes to the patch (a) changed the order where the new
> > > message is placed at one place to make it consistent with other
> > > places, (b) as discussed offlist, removed the extra increment to a
> > > local variable in ReorderBufferRestoreChange, (c) ran pgindent.
> > >
> > > See the attached and let me know what do you think?
> >
> > The changes look good to me.
> >
>
> Pushed!
Awesome - it's great to see this problem finally addressed!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-10-15 21:32:54 | Re: kevent latch paths don't handle postmaster death well |
| Previous Message | Russell Foster | 2020-10-15 19:56:51 | Re: [Patch] Using Windows groups for SSPI authentication |