Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend
Date: 2020-09-03 10:19:35
Message-ID: 20200903101935.GA19499@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:47:07AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I think this version is a clear improvement. Nothing more sticks out from a
> read-through.

Thanks for taking the time to look at it, Daniel. We of course could
still try to figure out how we could group all dependencies without
worrying about their type, but I'd like to leave that as future work
for now. This is much more complex than what's proposed on this
thread, and I am not sure if we really need to make this stuff more
complex for this purpose.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-09-03 10:47:22 Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-03 10:14:15 Re: Removal of currtid()/currtid2() and some table AM cleanup