Re: Refactor ReindexStmt and its "concurrent" boolean

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactor ReindexStmt and its "concurrent" boolean
Date: 2020-09-03 02:14:38
Message-ID: 20200903021438.GB14963@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 01:17:32PM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> Shouldn't options be an int? The rest of the patch looks good to me.

It should, thanks for looking at it. Let's wait a couple of days and
see if others have any comments. If there are no objections, I'll try
to commit this one.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
reindex-concurrent-refactor-v2.patch text/x-diff 10.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-09-03 03:01:25 Re: proposal - function string_to_table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-03 01:59:50 Re: proposal - function string_to_table