Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, osdba <mailtch(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: 2020-08-24 16:01:00
Message-ID: 20200824160100.GN26781@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:59:22AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Aug-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I don't think it is worth it, plus we would need to adjust the docs if
> > system catalog layout changes. I think we just want something concise
> > and simple, but also accurate.
>
> I argued for \dAo, not straight catalog output -- that was a straw man.
>
> I can't produce the docbook right now but I volunteer to show a
> screenshot for what I propose later this week.

Sure, I can wait. Is this the only place where it would make sense?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-08-24 16:08:50 Re: Procedures
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-08-24 16:00:23 Re: Procedures