Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, osdba <mailtch(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: 2020-08-24 15:59:22
Message-ID: 20200824155922.GA32094@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2020-Aug-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I don't think it is worth it, plus we would need to adjust the docs if
> system catalog layout changes. I think we just want something concise
> and simple, but also accurate.

I argued for \dAo, not straight catalog output -- that was a straw man.

I can't produce the docbook right now but I volunteer to show a
screenshot for what I propose later this week.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-08-24 16:00:23 Re: Procedures
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-08-24 15:51:29 Re: Procedures