Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 09:23:19PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:19:07PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Now that we can point people to psql's \dAo, do we really need to have
> > these tables at all?
>
> Having the tables is IMO still useful as a quick reference for users
> that don't have immediately psql at hand when working on an
> application, for example imagine somebody using pgAdmin. And I would
> imagine that such people are not few. Another risk here is somebody
> using psql with a server that has a major version different than the
> one they are working on, leading to false assumptions? Having at
> least a mention to those psql shortcuts in the docs is still a good
> idea IMO, as said upthread:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200804055651.GC2091@paquier.xyz

Yeah, I kind of like the table myself too, because this topic is already
so complicated.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee