| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, osdba <mailtch(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error? |
| Date: | 2020-08-22 12:23:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20200822122319.GA24782@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:19:07PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Now that we can point people to psql's \dAo, do we really need to have
> these tables at all?
Having the tables is IMO still useful as a quick reference for users
that don't have immediately psql at hand when working on an
application, for example imagine somebody using pgAdmin. And I would
imagine that such people are not few. Another risk here is somebody
using psql with a server that has a major version different than the
one they are working on, leading to false assumptions? Having at
least a mention to those psql shortcuts in the docs is still a good
idea IMO, as said upthread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200804055651.GC2091@paquier.xyz
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-08-22 13:30:22 | Re: Minor fixes for PostgreSQL 13 documentation |
| Previous Message | Robin Abbi | 2020-08-22 11:05:24 | Re: Procedures |