Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: osdba <mailtch(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: 2020-08-22 01:34:14
Message-ID: 20200822013414.GA2108@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 07:16:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I decided to remove the duplicates and just add "(multiple)" after
> operators that have multiple system table entries; patch attached.

Sounds like a good idea to me. Thanks.

Another idea I had after reading your email would be to use "for
multiple types", but simpler is likely better.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-08-22 01:36:46 Re: Typo in the Section "3.6. Inheritance"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-08-22 01:22:31 Re: Subscript expressions do not have to evaluate to integers