From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | osdba <mailtch(at)163(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error? |
Date: | 2020-08-21 23:16:16 |
Message-ID: | 20200821231616.GK13363@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 04:49:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:14:56PM +0800, osdba wrote:
> > "range_opsany range type&& &> &< >> << <@ -|- = @> @>", exist double "@>",
> >
> > Should be "<@ @>" ?
>
> Indeed, this needs to be improved. Another issue on the same page is
> that point_ops lists the same operator three times, <@. Other index
> pages don't seem to have any inconsistencies, fortunately.
I decided to remove the duplicates and just add "(multiple)" after
operators that have multiple system table entries; patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
operator.diff | text/x-diff | 772 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-08-21 23:36:41 | Re: Typo in the Section "3.6. Inheritance" |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-08-21 22:52:14 | Re: Procedures |