| From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix a couple of typos in JIT |
| Date: | 2020-08-20 11:26:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20200820112653.GB3386164@toroid.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2020-08-20 22:51:41 +1200, dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> > +This is done at query execution time, possibly even only in cases where
> > +the relevant task is done a number of times, makes it JIT, rather than
> > +ahead-of-time (AOT). Given the way JIT compilation is used in PostgreSQL,
> > +the lines between interpretation, AOT and JIT are somewhat blurry.
> > […]
>
> Oh, I see. I missed that. Perhaps it would be better changed to "The
> fact that this"
Or maybe even:
This is JIT, rather than ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation, because it
is done at query execution time, and perhaps only in cases where the
relevant task is repeated a number of times. Given the way …
-- Abhijit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amul Sul | 2020-08-20 11:47:08 | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-08-20 11:19:29 | Re: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size |