| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Date: | 2020-08-17 18:05:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20200817180514.tymcenlzcehtze2a@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-08-17 13:54:15 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:44:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > > Without a properly indented baseline that's hard to do, because it'll
> > > cause damage all over. So I don't think we easily can start just there -
> > > we'd first need to re-indent everything.
> >
> > Well, we can certainly do a tree-wide re-indent anytime we're ready.
> > I doubt it would be very painful right now, with so little new work
> > since the last run.
>
> Uh, I thought Tom was saying we need to reindent all branches, which
> would be a big change for those tracking forks.
I don't think he said that? He said *if* we were to reindent all
branches, forks would probably have an issue. We're already reindenting
HEAD on a regular basis (just very infrequent), so it can't be a
fundamental issue.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-17 18:05:24 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-08-17 17:54:15 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |