| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Date: | 2020-08-17 18:05:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1080039.1597687524@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:44:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, we can certainly do a tree-wide re-indent anytime we're ready.
>> I doubt it would be very painful right now, with so little new work
>> since the last run.
> Uh, I thought Tom was saying we need to reindent all branches, which
> would be a big change for those tracking forks.
No, I'm not for reindenting the back branches in general. There was
some discussion about whether to try to indent back-patched patches
to meet the conventions of the specific back branch, but I doubt
that that's worth troubling over. I think we really only care
about whether HEAD is fully consistently indented.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-17 18:11:47 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-08-17 18:05:14 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |