From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
Date: | 2020-06-24 23:15:17 |
Message-ID: | 20200624231517.GA13627@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:02:10PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > Indeed. And then perhaps we could eventually add some reporting /
> > monitoring infrastructure for the cases where plan time and execution
> > time memory estimate/usage widely differs.
> >
>
> I wouldn't mind something like that in general - not just for hashagg,
> but for various other nodes.
Well, other than worrying about problems with pre-13 queries, how is
this different from any other spill to disk when we exceed work_mem,
like sorts for merge join.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-06-24 23:18:10 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-06-24 21:02:10 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-06-24 23:18:10 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-06-24 23:03:40 | Re: Why forbid "INSERT INTO t () VALUES ();" |