From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: factorial of negative numbers |
Date: | 2020-06-16 08:55:18 |
Message-ID: | 20200616085518.GA31175@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:31:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 06:00, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Divison by zero is really undefined, 12345678 * 12345678 (just some numbers) is out of range of say int4, but factorial of a negative number has some meaning and is defined but PostgreSQL does not support it.
> >
>
> Actually, I think undefined/out-of-range is the right error to throw here.
>
> Most common implementations do regard factorial as undefined for
> anything other than positive integers, as well as following the
> convention that factorial(0) = 1. Some implementations extend the
> factorial to non-integer inputs, negative inputs, or even complex
> inputs by defining it in terms of the gamma function. However, even
> then, it is undefined for negative integer inputs.
Wow, they define it for negative inputs, but not negative integer
inputs? I am curious what the logic is behind that.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-06-16 09:06:55 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-06-16 08:30:15 | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. |