Re: Strategy for materialisation and centralisation of data

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Strategy for materialisation and centralisation of data
Date: 2020-05-21 19:33:12
Message-ID: 20200521193312.GA317@hermes.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 03:35:59PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:

> We have quite a few databases of type a and many of type b in a cluster.
> Both a and b types are fairly complex and are different solutions to a
> similar problem domain. All the databases are very read-centric, and all
> database interaction is currently through plpgsql with no materialised
> data.
>
> Some organisations have several type a and many type b databases, and
> need to query these in a homogeneous manner. We presently do this with
> many middleware requests or pl/proxy. An a or b type database belongs to
> 0 or 1 organisations.

Might postgres_fdw help in any way ?

Karsten
--
GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Klaas 2020-05-21 19:48:22 Help understanding SIReadLock growing without bound on completed transaction
Previous Message pabloa98 2020-05-21 19:28:26 Re: Should I use JSON?