| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES |
| Date: | 2020-05-18 17:03:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20200518170323.GA14610@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-May-18, Vik Fearing wrote:
> The syntax for FETCH FIRST allows the <fetch first quantity> to be
> absent (implying 1).
>
> We implement this correctly for ONLY, but WITH TIES didn't get the memo.
Oops, yes. I added a test. Will get this pushed immediately after I
see beta1 produced.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-WITH-TIES-number-of-rows-is-optional-and-default-to-.patch | text/x-diff | 2.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-18 17:22:38 | Re: Vintage unused variables in pg_dump.c |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-18 16:38:05 | Re: Why is pq_begintypsend so slow? |