| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | daniel(at)yesql(dot)se, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench |
| Date: | 2020-03-09 02:12:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20200309021203.GB96055@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 10:09:23AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks to both of you for the reviews. Please note that I will
> mention the business with pg_ctl and logging in a new thread and
> remove the diff of pg_ctl.c from the previous patch, and that the doc
> changes could be backpatched down to 12 for the relevant parts. The
> documentation for PG_COLORS is still missing, but that's not new and I
> think that we had better handle that case separately by creating a new
> section in the docs. For now, let's wait a couple of days and see if
> others have more thoughts to share about the doc patch of this thread.
Hearing nothing, done. The part about pgbench with PGHOST, PGUSER and
PGPORT could go further down, but it has been like that for years so I
did not bother.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-03-09 02:43:20 | Re: Exposure related to GUC value of ssl_passphrase_command |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-03-09 01:03:15 | Re: More tests to stress directly checksum_impl.h |