Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date: 2020-03-05 07:26:55
Message-ID: 20200305072655.GW2593@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:05:30PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> For "pgbench", you could also add the standard sentence that it uses libpq
>> environment variables, as it is also missing?
>
> Yeah, that's true. Let's fix this part while on it.

So, combining the feedback from Fabien, Juan and Daniel I am finishing
with the attached. Any thoughts?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
doc-frontend-colors-v2.patch text/x-diff 17.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-03-05 07:34:33 Re: Identifying user-created objects
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-03-05 07:15:28 Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side