Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date: 2020-03-05 08:40:07
Message-ID: 1FC3F2B4-8424-48B6-A792-F58EB4F2B799@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 5 Mar 2020, at 08:26, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:05:30PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> For "pgbench", you could also add the standard sentence that it uses libpq
>>> environment variables, as it is also missing?
>>
>> Yeah, that's true. Let's fix this part while on it.
>
> So, combining the feedback from Fabien, Juan and Daniel I am finishing
> with the attached. Any thoughts?

LGTM

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-03-05 08:44:24 Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2020-03-05 08:24:12 Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager