From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: document effect of USAGE on foreign server to dblink |
Date: | 2019-12-23 22:48:37 |
Message-ID: | 20191223224837.GA24866@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 03:54:44PM -0500, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:43 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:33:03AM -0500, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > I think that the permissions around the usage of foreign server names as
> > connection names in dblink should be documented, as in the attached.
>
> Uh, this looks like an odd place to document it, since this part is
> talking about permissions.
>
>
> Yes, giving this permission gives you usage of it in a place that is
> non-obvious, and that the doc doesn't mention. Isn't the place about
> permission the correct place to document these non-obvious permissions?
How is using a foreign server name in dblink a permission?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2019-12-26 10:32:31 | Concurrency |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-12-22 16:17:08 | Re: Default user 'postgres' not mentioned in the documentation? |