Re: document effect of USAGE on foreign server to dblink

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: document effect of USAGE on foreign server to dblink
Date: 2019-12-23 22:48:37
Message-ID: 20191223224837.GA24866@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 03:54:44PM -0500, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:43 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:33:03AM -0500, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > I think that the permissions around the usage of foreign server names as
> > connection names in dblink should be documented, as in the attached.
>
> Uh, this looks like an odd place to document it, since this part is
> talking about permissions.
>
>
> Yes, giving this permission gives you usage of it in a place that is
> non-obvious, and that the doc  doesn't mention.  Isn't the place about
> permission the correct place to document these non-obvious permissions?

How is using a foreign server name in dblink a permission?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2019-12-26 10:32:31 Concurrency
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-12-22 16:17:08 Re: Default user 'postgres' not mentioned in the documentation?