Re: Update minimum SSL version

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update minimum SSL version
Date: 2019-12-06 06:20:32
Message-ID: 20191206062032.GL121835@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 11:40:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> OK, re-reading the thread, I see the point --- old NetBSD has a weird
> OpenSSL version that this would break. OK, let's stay compatible
> with that on the back branches. So, your patch on HEAD and Daniel's
> in the back branches is the right thing. Please push.

Thanks, applied. I have tested Daniel's version with OpenSSL 0.9.8,
1.0.2 and 1.1.0 and the test was able to detect correctly the
macro/function in all cases.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-06 06:22:42 Re: Removal of support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
Previous Message Andy Fan 2019-12-06 05:56:01 what is the purpose to use 3 function to compare cost add_path/set_cheapest/get_cheapest_fractional_path