Re: Update minimum SSL version

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update minimum SSL version
Date: 2019-12-06 04:40:37
Message-ID: 13072.1575607237@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> About clear_options, my take is to remove the check on HEAD, and to
> apply Daniel's patch on *all* stable branches because I think that we
> should not break the business that happened with NetBSD 5 on already
> released branches. Does that sound good?

OK, re-reading the thread, I see the point --- old NetBSD has a weird
OpenSSL version that this would break. OK, let's stay compatible
with that on the back branches. So, your patch on HEAD and Daniel's
in the back branches is the right thing. Please push.

(Note: I didn't actually test Daniel's patch or read it closely ---
it looks like about the right thing, but please double check.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2019-12-06 04:58:11 [PATCH] print help from psql when user tries to run pg_restore, pg_dump etc
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2019-12-06 03:04:08 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum