From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: adding strndup |
Date: | 2019-12-04 22:01:46 |
Message-ID: | 20191204220146.GA28850@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Dec-04, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Dec-04, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > > On 2019-12-04 11:40:21 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > >> I think this should be pretty uncontroversial, but wanted to give a
> > >> heads-up outside that thread. I attach the patch here for completeness.
> >
> > > I'd just provide pnstrdup() in the frontend, without adding strndup().
> >
> > +1 --- seems like a bunch more mechanism than is warranted. Let's
> > just open-code it in pnstrdup. We can rely on strnlen, since that's
> > already supported, and there's not much more there beyond that.
>
> I can get behind that ... it makes the patch a lot smaller.
Here it is.
I noticed that ECPG's copy was setting errno. I had forgot to do that
in my previous patch, but on second look, malloc failure already sets
it, so doing it again is pointless.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Offer-pnstrdup-to-frontend-code.patch | text/x-diff | 5.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-12-04 22:17:10 | Re: adding strndup |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-12-04 21:34:42 | Re: more backtraces |