Re: more backtraces

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: more backtraces
Date: 2019-12-04 21:34:42
Message-ID: 1847.1575495282@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> It'd be bad if the addition of backtraces for SEGV/BUS suddenly made it
> harder to attach a debugger and getting useful results.

Yeah. TBH, I'm not sure I want this, at least not in debug builds.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-12-04 22:01:46 Re: adding strndup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-12-04 20:36:19 Re: Dumping/restoring fails on inherited generated column