| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Paul Guo <pguo(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Asim R P <apraveen(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Taylor Vesely <tvesely(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
| Subject: | Re: Batch insert in CTAS/MatView code |
| Date: | 2019-11-27 09:18:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20191127091831.GE237562@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:38:02AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> That does not strike me as a good idea. The upper layer is going to need
> to manage some resources (e.g. it's the only bit that knows about how to
> manage lifetime of the incoming data), and by exposing it to each AM
> we're going to duplicate the necessary code too.
Latest status of the thread maps with a patch which still applies,
still the discussion could go on as more review is needed. So I have
moved it to next CF.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-11-27 09:29:33 | Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-27 09:14:58 | Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions |