Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Date: 2019-09-13 05:12:22
Message-ID: 20190913051222.GE2285@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:59:40AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think that is what we have not done in one of the cases pointed by me.

Thinking more about it, I see your point now. HEAP_LOCKED_UPGRADED is
not a direct combination of the other flags and depends on other
conditions, so we cannot make a combination of it with other things.
The three others don't have that problem.

Attached is a patch to fix your suggestions. This also removes the
use of HEAP_XMAX_IS_LOCKED_ONLY which did not make completely sense
either as a "raw" flag. While on it, the order of the flags can be
improved to match more the order of htup_details.h

Does this patch address your concerns?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
pageinspect-combine-flags.patch text/x-diff 4.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2019-09-13 06:20:28 Re: pgsql: Use data directory inode number, not port, to select SysV resour
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-09-13 04:31:17 Re: Create collation reporting the ICU locale display name