Posible off topic ? pgmodeler

From: stan <stanb(at)panix(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Posible off topic ? pgmodeler
Date: 2019-09-02 17:31:14
Message-ID: 20190902173114.GC1796@panix.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Some very helpful folks pointed me to pgmodeler recently.

I realize this list may not be the appropriate forum for discussing this, and
would welcome pointers to a more appropriate forum.

Having said that, this discussion may be a bit more generic.

I have seen a number of open source products (Amanda is a good example), where a
company sort of "takes over" the project, the company's bossiness plan is generally
that of making money on support. Most of these companies have a community edition,
which trails development of the product with their enhancements. U understand
that this model is acceptable to GPL licensed software.

The company supporting pgmodeler seems to have a different model. It looks like
they provide a version of the tool that requires a license key, with limited life
span.

What I am trying to do, at the moment is get a complete understanding of their
bossiness model, regarding the source code for this project.

Thanks for any input on this.

--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Susan Hurst 2019-09-02 20:43:25 Re: Posible off topic ? pgmodeler
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-09-02 15:32:22 Re: partition by range or by list constraint check (was Re: literal vs dynamic partition constraint in plan execution)