From: | stan <stanb(at)panix(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Posible off topic ? pgmodeler |
Date: | 2019-09-02 17:31:14 |
Message-ID: | 20190902173114.GC1796@panix.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Some very helpful folks pointed me to pgmodeler recently.
I realize this list may not be the appropriate forum for discussing this, and
would welcome pointers to a more appropriate forum.
Having said that, this discussion may be a bit more generic.
I have seen a number of open source products (Amanda is a good example), where a
company sort of "takes over" the project, the company's bossiness plan is generally
that of making money on support. Most of these companies have a community edition,
which trails development of the product with their enhancements. U understand
that this model is acceptable to GPL licensed software.
The company supporting pgmodeler seems to have a different model. It looks like
they provide a version of the tool that requires a license key, with limited life
span.
What I am trying to do, at the moment is get a complete understanding of their
bossiness model, regarding the source code for this project.
Thanks for any input on this.
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Susan Hurst | 2019-09-02 20:43:25 | Re: Posible off topic ? pgmodeler |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-02 15:32:22 | Re: partition by range or by list constraint check (was Re: literal vs dynamic partition constraint in plan execution) |