Re: s/rewinded/rewound/?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Liudmila Mantrova <l(dot)mantrova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: s/rewinded/rewound/?
Date: 2019-08-08 09:29:03
Message-ID: 20190808092903.GB3194@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:48:29PM +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
> If we decide to fix this, we should probably revise and back-patch the whole
> paragraph where it appears as it seems to mix up scanning target cluster
> WALs and applying source cluster WALs. A small patch is attached for your
> consideration (originally proposed on pgsql-docs [1]).

Okay, I can see the confusion, and your proposed rewording looks fine
to me. Any objections?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message yuzuko 2019-08-08 09:58:59 Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-08-08 09:22:31 Re: Documentation clarification re: ANALYZE