From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Liudmila Mantrova <l(dot)mantrova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: s/rewinded/rewound/? |
Date: | 2019-08-08 09:29:03 |
Message-ID: | 20190808092903.GB3194@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:48:29PM +0300, Liudmila Mantrova wrote:
> If we decide to fix this, we should probably revise and back-patch the whole
> paragraph where it appears as it seems to mix up scanning target cluster
> WALs and applying source cluster WALs. A small patch is attached for your
> consideration (originally proposed on pgsql-docs [1]).
Okay, I can see the confusion, and your proposed rewording looks fine
to me. Any objections?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | yuzuko | 2019-08-08 09:58:59 | Re: Problem with default partition pruning |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-08-08 09:22:31 | Re: Documentation clarification re: ANALYZE |