From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix runtime errors from -fsanitize=undefined |
Date: | 2019-07-04 23:33:53 |
Message-ID: | 20190704233353.GA1397438@rfd.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:21:48PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> After many years of trying, it seems the -fsanitize=undefined checking
> in gcc is now working somewhat reliably. Attached is a patch that fixes
> all errors of the kind
>
> runtime error: null pointer passed as argument N, which is declared to
> never be null
>
> Most of the cases are calls to memcpy(), memcmp(), etc. with a length of
> zero, so one appears to get away with passing a null pointer.
I just saw this proposal. The undefined behavior in question is strictly
academic. These changes do remove the need for new users to discover
-fno-sanitize=nonnull-attribute, but they make the code longer and no clearer.
Given the variety of code this touches, I expect future commits will
reintroduce the complained-of usage patterns, prompting yet more commits to
restore the invariant achieved here. Hence, I'm -0 for this change.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-07-05 00:06:09 | Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index. |
Previous Message | Jose Luis Tallon | 2019-07-04 22:08:16 | Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version() |