| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2019-05-09 04:11:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20190509041154.GC14573@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 11:28:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> No problem to do that. I'll brush up all that once you commit the
>> first piece you have come up with, and reuse the new API of catalog.c
>> you are introducing based on the table OID.
>
> Pushed my stuff, have at it.
Thanks. Attached is what I get to after scanning the error messages
in indexcmds.c and index.c. Perhaps you have more comments about it?
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| reindex-catalog-errors-v3.patch | text/x-diff | 6.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | craig.ringer | 2019-05-09 04:25:52 | Re: Implicit timezone conversion replicating from timestamp to timestamptz? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-09 03:28:35 | Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |