Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2019-05-09 03:28:35
Message-ID: 14251.1557372515@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> No problem to do that. I'll brush up all that once you commit the
> first piece you have come up with, and reuse the new API of catalog.c
> you are introducing based on the table OID.

Pushed my stuff, have at it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-09 04:11:54 Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-05-09 02:37:05 Re: Fuzzy thinking in is_publishable_class