Re: [Patch] Base backups and random or zero pageheaders

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Base backups and random or zero pageheaders
Date: 2019-05-04 12:50:46
Message-ID: 20190504125046.GC4805@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 03:07:43PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> This is still an open item for the back branches I guess, i.e. zero page
> header for pg_verify_checksums and additionally random page header for
> pg_basebackup's base backup.

I may be missing something, but could you add an entry in the future
commit fest about the stuff discussed here? I have not looked at your
patch closely.. Sorry.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-05-04 12:59:20 Re: Heap lock levels for REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY not quite right?
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-05-04 12:43:29 Re: Wrong return code in vacuumdb when multiple jobs are used