From: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [Patch] Base backups and random or zero pageheaders |
Date: | 2019-10-18 09:05:52 |
Message-ID: | 1571389552.26469.8.camel@credativ.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 04.05.2019, 21:50 +0900 schrieb Michael Paquier:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 03:07:43PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > This is still an open item for the back branches I guess, i.e. zero page
> > header for pg_verify_checksums and additionally random page header for
> > pg_basebackup's base backup.
>
> I may be missing something, but could you add an entry in the future
> commit fest about the stuff discussed here? I have not looked at your
> patch closely.. Sorry.
Here is finally a rebased patch for the (IMO) more important issue in
pg_basebackup. I've added a commitfest entry for this now:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/25/2308/
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax: +49 2166 9901-100
Email: michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
Unser Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten unterliegt
folgenden Bestimmungen: https://www.credativ.de/datenschutz
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Fix-checksum-verification-in-base-backups-for-random.patch | text/x-patch | 12.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2019-10-18 09:21:52 | Re: Partitioning versus autovacuum |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-18 08:42:25 | Re: UPSERT on view does not find constraint by name |