From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Evgeniy Efimkin <efimkin(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Дмитрий Сарафанников <dsarafan(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Андрей Бородин <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Владимир Бородин <root(at)simply(dot)name> |
Subject: | Re: Special role for subscriptions |
Date: | 2019-03-12 02:39:15 |
Message-ID: | 20190312023915.GE13812@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 06:32:10PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> * Is the original idea of a special role still viable?
In my opinion, that part may be valuable. The latest patches proposed
change the way tables are filtered and listed on the subscription
side, lowering the permission to spawn a new thread and to connect to a
publication server by just being a database owner instead of being a
superuser, and that's quite a gap.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-03-12 02:47:29 | Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-12 02:28:59 | Re: Unaccent extension python script Issue in Windows |