From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Removed unused variable, openLogOff. |
Date: | 2019-03-11 00:40:12 |
Message-ID: | 20190311004012.GC1818@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> After sleeping on it, let's live with just switching to nleft in the
> message, without openLogOff as that's the second time folks complain
> about the previous code. So I just propose the attached. Robert,
> others, any objections? Perhaps you would prefer fixing it yourself?
Okay, done.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-11 01:11:14 | Re: pgsql: Include GUC's unit, if it has one, in out-of-range error message |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-11 00:38:47 | pgsql: Adjust error message for partial writes in WAL segments |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Fan | 2019-03-11 00:54:58 | Re: what makes the PL cursor life-cycle must be in the same transaction? |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-03-11 00:17:20 | Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons |