Re: [PATCH] Pass COPT and PROFILE to CXXFLAGS as well

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pass COPT and PROFILE to CXXFLAGS as well
Date: 2019-01-22 21:11:23
Message-ID: 201901222111.ki5n27j2e5cf@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

On 2019-Jan-22, Andres Freund wrote:

> On 2019-01-22 17:10:58 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I don't understand why you don't want to backpatch the PGXS bits.
>
> Largely because I think it's an independent patch from the CXXOPT need
> from Christopher / Debian packaging. It's a larger patch, that needs
> more docs etc. If whoever applies that wants to backpatch it - I'm not
> going to protest, I just wouldn't myself, unless somebody pipes up that
> it'd help them.

Ah, I see. No arguments against.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-01-22 21:31:15 Re: Delay locking partitions during INSERT and UPDATE
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-01-22 21:01:52 Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue