Greetings,
* Tsunakawa, Takayuki (tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com) wrote:
> From: Christoph Berg [mailto:christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de]
> > A customer was complaining that the "checkpoint starting: xlog"
> > message was not included in the grand PG10 rename of user-visible bits.
> > The attached patch fixes that.
>
> Can we make use of this chance to change elog() to ereport(), so that the two messages are translated?
+1, and we should probably look for nearby cases to fix also..
Thanks!
Stephen