From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces |
Date: | 2018-11-07 15:45:59 |
Message-ID: | 20181107154559.2baq4nei5s22sahg@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Nov-04, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 12:30:15PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2018-11-03 16:24:28 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> On 2018-Nov-03, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> Well, you've guaranteed that already. Now 11 will be different from
> >>> 11.1, and tables will be different from indexes until somebody goes
> >>> and makes that consistent again.
> >>
> >> Nobody is running 11.0 in production.
> >
> > Uh, I know of people doing so.
>
> My understanding of the term GA is that anything marked as GA is
> considered enough stable for production use, and that beta releases are
> here for testing. So I don't get the argument.
I think 11.0 is ready for testing that a migration from a production
running 10.x, but not for just blindly migrating. If you wanted to take
such a leap of faith, surely you'd wait for 11.1 at the very least.
> And you have made partitioned indexes now inconsistent with
> partitioned tables.
I don't buy this consistency argument. Partitions on partitioned tables
are not created automatically. They are for indexes. We just got bug
report #15490 about the problem I fixed.
> Seeing this stuff discussed and committed in haste gives me the sad
> face.
Nah.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-07 15:55:13 | Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so |
Previous Message | Pavel Raiskup | 2018-11-07 15:27:46 | Re: plruby: rb_iterate symbol clash with libruby.so |