| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: partitioned indexes and tablespaces |
| Date: | 2018-11-04 00:09:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20181104000906.GB1743@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 12:30:15PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-11-03 16:24:28 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2018-Nov-03, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Well, you've guaranteed that already. Now 11 will be different from
>>> 11.1, and tables will be different from indexes until somebody goes
>>> and makes that consistent again.
>>
>> Nobody is running 11.0 in production.
>
> Uh, I know of people doing so.
My understanding of the term GA is that anything marked as GA is
considered enough stable for production use, and that beta releases are
here for testing. So I don't get the argument. And you have made
partitioned indexes now inconsistent with partitioned tables.
Seeing this stuff discussed and committed in haste gives me the sad
face.
:(
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-11-04 00:17:04 | Re: New function pg_stat_statements_reset_query() to reset statistics of a specific query |
| Previous Message | LAM JUN RONG | 2018-11-03 22:17:39 | Re: [PATCH] Improvements to "Getting started" tutorial for Google Code-in task |