Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: myungkyu(dot)lim(at)samsung(dot)com, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_replication vs StandbyReplyMessage
Date: 2018-10-25 11:49:30
Message-ID: 20181025114930.GC1327@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:13:53AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> MyungKyu LIM wrote:
>> I saw this topic in todo list,
>>
>> so I implemented simple patch.
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1657809367.407321.1533027417725.JavaMail.jboss%40ep2ml404
>
> For the archives' sake, please always reply on the original thread.

And if you could add some documentation into the patch, and register it
to the commit fest if you would like to get it reviewed, that would be
nice. Here are some general guidelines on the matter:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-10-25 11:52:01 Re: [PATCH] Tab complete EXECUTE FUNCTION for CREATE (EVENT) TRIGGER
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-25 11:45:57 Re: Using old master as new replica after clean switchover